Insights and Inspiration
from the
Holy Land
from
from
Rabbi Ephraim Schwartz
"Your friend in Karmiel"
August 26th 2016 -Volume 6, Issue 47
8th Av 5776
Parshat Eikev
Sign of all Times
There was nothing I could say that could get
him to come over. I tried everything. But he was a stubborn Israeli. You know
the type. I mean it was Des Moines Iowa for gosh sake. How many Jews were there
in this state? Yet he wouldn’t be budged. He came to America to start a new
life and Judaism was not in his plans. His wife, Luna was sweet. She would
babysit for us. She was interested in yiddishkeit. She would’ve loved to come
for a Shabbos meal. But not Marseille. He knew that we were out for his soul.
He was not coming.
It was finally Lag Ba’Omer time,
providentially I bumped into Marseille in the supermarket. I think it was
called Hy-Vee or some other Iowa sounding name. I went over to Marseille and
invited him over for our annual BBQ. I assured him that there was absolutely
nothing religious about it. It was just a few of us Jews getting together for a
“mangal”- an Israeli word for BBQ that always conjures up road-kill in my mind.
We would just chill, have some beers, play some music and sit around a fire. C’mon,
I told him, how many MOT’s are there here anyways? We gotta stick together.
Much to my surprise it worked. Marseille and
Luna showed up. Cool! I sat down with him under a tree, I remember, and we
started to schmooze. I asked him a question. I told him that I had once seen a
statistic about what percentage of Jews in Israel have a mezuza on their door.
He guessed that it was close to 75%. I told him that it was actually about 83%.
Then I told him I saw a second poll. This one asked that if it was a law that
you had to put a mezuza on your door, what percentage of Israelis would have
one. He guessed that it was about 50%. Actually the statistic was closer to
42%. It seems that quite a number of religious Jews would also take it off. The
anti-medinat Yisrael government ones would certainly be in a quandary.
I explained to him that the reason why I
understood this would happen was because the commandments-the mitzvot were
given to us to express our free-will and choose to serve Hashem. If someone is
forced or externally-legislated to perform a mitzva, then in truth it is lack
that essential component. It’s not the real thing. It’s not the way it’s meant
to be.
I told Marseille that I believed in that
concept fundamentally. I didn’t believe and would never try to force anyone to
do any mitzva. Yet I wanted him to come for a Shabbat meal. If he doesn’t’ want
to wear a Kippa, I was fine with that. If he didn’t want to come for Kiddush,
didn’t want to make blessings, wanted to leave before bentching after the meal,
it wouldn’t impact my desire at all to have him join us for our meal. I just
wanted to spend time with my fellow Jew, with my brother, here in Iowa. He
agreed! He came over that first Shabbos without a Kippa, he didn’t wash for the
bread, he didn’t respond Amen to my blessings and he left before we bentched.
But we had a great meal. So much so that two weeks later he came again and
again. Eventually he put on a kippa, not long after he started sticking around
for the whole meal including the bentching, and eventually he made his own
Shabbat meals and even would come to classes.. A short while later he left Des
Moines and I still have the letter that he wrote me in Hebrew.
Dear
Rabbi Schwartz, I just want to thank you so much for all you hve done and
shared with me and my family. You know when I lived in Israel if I saw a
religious Jew- Lo Haya Shava Afilu et Harok Sheli-it wasn’t even worth wasting
my spit on him. That’s the way I felt. But now out here in Iowa, together with
your family, your community, our community. I believe that after 120 and you
can go to our Father in Heaven and tell him that you have returned at least one
son back home.
Thank
You and Shalom,
Marseille
This week’s Torah portion which continues the
rebuke of Moshe Rabbeinu before he passes and before we enter the land contains
in it the 2nd of the two parshiyot that command and are written in
our mezuzot. The first being Shema from last week’s Torah portion. The Parsha
tells us that we should beware lest our hearts will be seduced and we will turn
away and serve false gods and Hashem willpersih us quickly from the good land
that He has given us. So we should place these words on our heart and our souls
and bind them as sign on our arms and
they should be tefillin between our eyes… and we shall write them upon the
mezuzos-the doorposts of our homes. Rashi quotes a fascinating midrash that
says-
“Even
after you are exiled be distinguished through mitzvos. Put on Tefiilin, make
mezuzos so that they shall not be new to you when you will return as it says in
Yirmiyahu “Erect markers for yourself”.
The Midrash in fact quotes a parable of a King
who got angry at his wife and she was sent to her father’s house. Before
leaving the King told her that she should continue to wear he fine robes so
that when she returns it shouldn’t feel new to her.
Many of the commentaries deal with the strange
question of why one would think that we are not obligated in the commandments
upon being exiled. Besides the commandments that depend on living in Israel or
the Temple seemingly all the mitzvos are always applicable. Also why does Rashi
choose these two mitzvos, or better yet, why does the Torah enumerate these
particular mitzvos as being the signs and markers that we should be careful
with.
Reb Yonasan Eibishutz suggests a fascinating
insight where he views the greatest threat to the Jewish people is that we
forget how different we are how special we are. After the trauma of the Exile,
after the millennia of persecution, the natural desire of our people is to
become like all other nations. To assimilate. To give up our mandate, our
chosen nation status. To forget how loved we are by Hashem, by the King. We
need markers to hang up that the light is still on. To distinguish ourselves.
That is the Tefilin that is the mezuzot. The Tefilin is like that incredible
hug every morning that our parent gives a child before he sends him off to
school. “I love you honey, be good”. A kiss on the head right between the eyes
so that it should penetrate our minds and a warm hug that brings that embrace
right up to our hearts. We leave our house and we have one last kiss good-bye.
That doorway that tells us I’ll be here when you come home. I’ll be waiting for
you. We kiss that post. We feel that our house is different than any other one
down the block.
The mitzvos of Tefilin and Mezuza are found in
the section of the Rambam known as Ahava/ Love. That is the signs that we have
to place for ourselves. If we feel loved in our Galut, in our Exile, then it
won’t feel strange when we will be redeemed.
Hashem is telling the Jewish people that the
redemption will come. He tells us this even as he tells us that we will be
exiled. But He wants us to know that we will return to Him, but it should not
be like a long-lost son that is first meeting his birth-father. Rather it is
like the father that is with us even through allour hardships. That is there to
give us that hug and kiss every morning, every night that our house no matter where
it may be still has a marker on it that says this is a home with love. This is
a home that will be redeemed. Hashem can’t force us to do mitzvos. He can’t
force us to accept that love. But what child doesn’t appreciate having it? What
child could say no to that precious embrace? Is it any wonder that as distant
as we Jews might be from observance yet when someone buys a house they still
look for that mezuza. That whenever one puts on Tefilin and closes one’s eyes
one can feel that special connection.
Perhaps the most meaningful moment I
experienced was when Marseille asked me to find him a mezuza for his apartment.
It had been a few months since he had started coming. As we were nailing it to
the door I spoke about the sign of the mezuza being that sign the light is
still on. As he made the blessing, and I recited amen. I thought about the
generations before him that had done this same mitzva. The hundreds of
communities throughout the millennia since we were exiled from our Land that
his family must have traversed. They each had that sign, that post, that love
note tacked onto the door. Am Yisrael Chai. Od Avinu Chai.
Have a great Shabbos,
Rabbi Ephraim Schwartz
*************************************
RABBI SCHWARTZ COOL VIDEO CLIPS OF THE WEEK
https://youtu.be/yhoeIe-eFJw – This is last weeks Parsh but I just thought very cool song
vaetchanan by nebi musa- the prayers of Moshe to Hashem to allow him in the
land song by Kobi Eved
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf8CpMduLak
– rare
footage of the Satmar Rebbe-yartzeit this week Reb Yoel Teitelbaum- interesting
that the song they sing I know as Tzion Tzion which is kind of ironic I guess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnYXSffZK38
– A moving tribute to Esther Jungreiss who passed
this week- the mother of the Kiruv movement
RABBI SCHWARTZ’S
FAVORITE YIDDISH PROVERB OF THE WEEK
“Az dos harts iz ful, geyen di oygn iber..”- When the heart is full, the eyes overflow.
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S JEWISH PERSONALITY AND HIS
QUOTES IN HONOR OF THE YARTZEIT OF THE WEEK
“In the old
country, I was a father at home, and could be a Rebbe in the city. But here this
is simply not suitable. I have to be a father to my community, and a Rebbe at
home”
“If I had the strength (he was in his sixties at the time)
I’d also go to work-Poverty can sway a man from loyalty to his Creator.” Encouraging his chasidim to find gainful
employment upon finding many of them sitting in his shul learning rather than
going to work
“How
many people did you invite to your wedding?” “At how much per couple? … What
did your furniture cost? … So much? And you want the community to support you?
Forget about it. Kollel is not for you.”.- The Rebbe’s screening process to be accepted
in his Kollel
“I don’t care if I’m left with only one minyan
of adherents. I’ll not refrain from expressing my beliefs.”
Rav
Yoel Teitelbaum the Satmar Rebbe (5647 / 1887
- 5739 / 1979).
The Satmar Rav, a direct descendant of both the famed Yismach Moshe and the Chavas Daas, was recognized as a young man for his unusual lomdus, hasmadah and tzidkus – Torah scholarship, diligence and piety. By the outbreak of World War 11, he was Rav of the thriving community of Satmar and had emerged as one of the leading figures in Hungarian Jewry. From childhood, the Satmar Rebbe was a paragon of holiness and purity. Throughout his life, his face shone with the purity of an innocent child, and until his final days no creases marked his countenance.
When the Divrei Yechezkel of Shineva saw the nine-year-old Yoelish at the wedding of his brother, the Atzei Chaim, the Divrei Yechezkel commented, “That child has holy eyes.”
At his bar mitzvah he stunned the entire assemblage by delivering a two-hour drashah, replete with deep and meaningful chiddushim. His father’s ensuring his immersion in the depths of Torah in his young years would yet be of inestimable benefit to Klal Yisrael. From the time of his Bar Mitzvah until the outbreak of World War I1 – a period of forty years – Reb Yoel never slept on a bed, except for Shabbosos – studying Torah, on his feet, by day and by night … In the internment camp in Bergen-Belsen, not only did he eat nothing that might have been un-kosher, subsisting mostly on potatoes, but he fasted as often as four times a week.
His father, the Kedushat Yom Tov passed away when Reb Yoel was only 17 years of age. He was appointed Rav of Musza in Czechoslovakia and in 1911, when he was in his early twenties, Reb Yoel was appointed Rav of Orshiva. Thirteen years later he became Rav of Kruly, where he founded a yeshivah. In 1934, after the death of the Harav Eliezer Dovid Greenwald of Satmar, he became Rav from 1935 to 1944 and transferred his yeshivah there.
The Satmar Rebbe endured his share of suffering during the Holocaust. Dr. P. Kennedy, a Hungarian Zionist leader who was with the Rebbe for five months in Bergen-Belsen, relates that the Rebbe’s beard was unskillfully concealed with a kerchief on the pretext of a toothache. The Nazis nearly cut it on several occasions, but it was miraculously saved and remained intact.
He was one of 1684 Hungarian Jews saved from the Nazi killing machine as a result of the negotiations of Rav Michael Ber Weissmandl with Adolf Eichmann, ym’s. With rachamei Shamayim, Reb Yoel made it out of Hungary during the war, and after a brief stay in Switzerland he arrived in Eretz Yisrael.
In 1946, he arrived in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn and rebuilt the Satmar community.
The Satmar Rav, a direct descendant of both the famed Yismach Moshe and the Chavas Daas, was recognized as a young man for his unusual lomdus, hasmadah and tzidkus – Torah scholarship, diligence and piety. By the outbreak of World War 11, he was Rav of the thriving community of Satmar and had emerged as one of the leading figures in Hungarian Jewry. From childhood, the Satmar Rebbe was a paragon of holiness and purity. Throughout his life, his face shone with the purity of an innocent child, and until his final days no creases marked his countenance.
When the Divrei Yechezkel of Shineva saw the nine-year-old Yoelish at the wedding of his brother, the Atzei Chaim, the Divrei Yechezkel commented, “That child has holy eyes.”
At his bar mitzvah he stunned the entire assemblage by delivering a two-hour drashah, replete with deep and meaningful chiddushim. His father’s ensuring his immersion in the depths of Torah in his young years would yet be of inestimable benefit to Klal Yisrael. From the time of his Bar Mitzvah until the outbreak of World War I1 – a period of forty years – Reb Yoel never slept on a bed, except for Shabbosos – studying Torah, on his feet, by day and by night … In the internment camp in Bergen-Belsen, not only did he eat nothing that might have been un-kosher, subsisting mostly on potatoes, but he fasted as often as four times a week.
His father, the Kedushat Yom Tov passed away when Reb Yoel was only 17 years of age. He was appointed Rav of Musza in Czechoslovakia and in 1911, when he was in his early twenties, Reb Yoel was appointed Rav of Orshiva. Thirteen years later he became Rav of Kruly, where he founded a yeshivah. In 1934, after the death of the Harav Eliezer Dovid Greenwald of Satmar, he became Rav from 1935 to 1944 and transferred his yeshivah there.
The Satmar Rebbe endured his share of suffering during the Holocaust. Dr. P. Kennedy, a Hungarian Zionist leader who was with the Rebbe for five months in Bergen-Belsen, relates that the Rebbe’s beard was unskillfully concealed with a kerchief on the pretext of a toothache. The Nazis nearly cut it on several occasions, but it was miraculously saved and remained intact.
He was one of 1684 Hungarian Jews saved from the Nazi killing machine as a result of the negotiations of Rav Michael Ber Weissmandl with Adolf Eichmann, ym’s. With rachamei Shamayim, Reb Yoel made it out of Hungary during the war, and after a brief stay in Switzerland he arrived in Eretz Yisrael.
In 1946, he arrived in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn and rebuilt the Satmar community.
When he
settled in Williamsburg shortly after arriving in the United States, he found a
handful of his followers in a bais hamidrash all day, saying Tehillim, learning
Chok – and spending their time in “the Rebbe’s Court”. He summoned them to him
and insisted that they find jobs to support their families. He felt that he
could not be oblivious to the stress on material well-being that marks American
society. A viable community could only take shape if it is self-supporting on a
level comparable to that of the surrounding society. By the same token, he
guided his followers to give tzeddakah expansively – not to shy away from a
sweeping gesture of generosity. Today, members of the Satmar community are
active in all phases of business and commerce, as well as in a wide spectrum of
occupations, ranging from grocers to computer programmers. And the community
itself supports a host of social services, most notably its bikur-cholim
program – administering to the sick, with fleets of cars and vans carrying
hundreds of volunteers to hospitals all over New York, throughout the day.
He was a Gaon who’s almost unparalleled genius was respected by all. His piety and sanctity were viewed with awe; indeed, his lifetime was a saga of kedushah. He stood as a bastion of Torah, unswerving and uncompromising through all the raging tempests of the anti-Torah rebellions of his turbulent times.
The Satmar Rebbe vehemently opposed Zionism and secularism in all forms, and was a great kana’i when it came to matters of kiddush Shem Shamayim. He fought the founding of the State of Israel, predicting that it would lead to the destruction of many spiritual values. Most of world Jewry had accepted the Zionist dream. And even many among those who had rejected its limited, secular definition of Jewishness were excited by the emergence of the State of Israel, and the miraculous victories in ’48, ’56 and ’67. The Satmar Rav was often alone in consistently condemning the State as the pure embodiment of a secular ideal, a ma’ase Sattan: dismissing victories on the battlefield as an ideological minefield; opposing mass aliyah as a violation of the Three Vows (T.B. Kesubos 11a : Binding Jewry not to force its way into Eretz Yisrael, nor to rebel against the nations, and the nations not to subjugate the Jews excessively.) for settling the country in defiance of world opinion; and participation in the government in any form – even voting in national elections – as strengthening a reprehensible concept by implied recognition. Like some other schools, those of the Eida Hachreidis, which is in the Satmar orbit, do not accept funding from the Israeli government.
He was a Gaon who’s almost unparalleled genius was respected by all. His piety and sanctity were viewed with awe; indeed, his lifetime was a saga of kedushah. He stood as a bastion of Torah, unswerving and uncompromising through all the raging tempests of the anti-Torah rebellions of his turbulent times.
The Satmar Rebbe vehemently opposed Zionism and secularism in all forms, and was a great kana’i when it came to matters of kiddush Shem Shamayim. He fought the founding of the State of Israel, predicting that it would lead to the destruction of many spiritual values. Most of world Jewry had accepted the Zionist dream. And even many among those who had rejected its limited, secular definition of Jewishness were excited by the emergence of the State of Israel, and the miraculous victories in ’48, ’56 and ’67. The Satmar Rav was often alone in consistently condemning the State as the pure embodiment of a secular ideal, a ma’ase Sattan: dismissing victories on the battlefield as an ideological minefield; opposing mass aliyah as a violation of the Three Vows (T.B. Kesubos 11a : Binding Jewry not to force its way into Eretz Yisrael, nor to rebel against the nations, and the nations not to subjugate the Jews excessively.) for settling the country in defiance of world opinion; and participation in the government in any form – even voting in national elections – as strengthening a reprehensible concept by implied recognition. Like some other schools, those of the Eida Hachreidis, which is in the Satmar orbit, do not accept funding from the Israeli government.
he mainstream
of the Torah leadership did not subscribe to his approach toward dealing with
the Israeli government. Even those most strongly opposed to the State’s
philosophy accepted its existence and, at worst, felt compelled to deal with it
as they would with any government that ruled a land where Jews lived. At times
they were deeply upset with his unyielding approach – such as Rabbi Aharon
Kotler’s vexation with the Rebbe for “publicly opposing the Chazon Ish, Reb
Isser Zalman Meltzer, the Belzer Rebbe and the Tchebiner Rav – all of whom held
that voting in Israeli national elections was an obligation on every Torah Jew
who took the needs of the Yishuv to heart.” Nonetheless, they were always aware
of the Satmar position and often measured their stance against the extremes of
the Satmar-Neturei Karta ideology. And even the most rabid, anti-religious
secularist was aware of the “on the other hand,” represented by this one man’s
uncompromising stance.
It was not
only in regard to its extreme anti-Zionism that the Satmar Rav had molded his
community as “a group apart,” in the manner of Avraham Halvri. He also guided
it to being distinguished in its total lack of compromise in mode of dress –
not yielding to American pressures, neither in style nor in lack of modesty. If
anything, the newer generations have reinforced their dedication to the
standards of “Jewishness in dress” that had prevailed in Satmar of old.
Thus, the
Satmar Rav’s relentless demands for the highest religious standards proved to
be an important contribution toward changing the complexion of a significant
segment of Orthodox life in America. Witness: Holocaust survivors and their
American-born grandchildren – dayanim (rabbinical judges), rabbanim, diamond
polishers, computer technicians, and gas-pump attendants among them – who
proudly walk the streets of the New World in traditional garb, making the
shtreimel an every week feature of many communities.
His
unrelenting search for truth was not reserved for public issues alone, but was
also uncompromisingly applied to himself.
Reb Yoel wrote a series of sefarim on Chumash, mo’adim and various subjects in Shas, as well as she’eilot u’teshuvot entitled Divrei Yoel. He also wrote the sefer Vayoel Moshe and a kuntres, Al Hageulah Ve’al Hatemurah.
The Satmar Rebbe was niftar on 26 Menachem Av 5739/1979 and was buried in the beit hachaim in Kiryat Yoel in Monroe, New York.
Reb Yoel wrote a series of sefarim on Chumash, mo’adim and various subjects in Shas, as well as she’eilot u’teshuvot entitled Divrei Yoel. He also wrote the sefer Vayoel Moshe and a kuntres, Al Hageulah Ve’al Hatemurah.
The Satmar Rebbe was niftar on 26 Menachem Av 5739/1979 and was buried in the beit hachaim in Kiryat Yoel in Monroe, New York.
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S TOUR GUIDE EXAM QUESTION OF
THE WEEK
answer below at end of Email
An active monastery in the Judean Desert is:
- Martyrius, in Ma’ale Adumim
- Euthymius, in Mishor Adumim
- George, in Wadi Qelt
- Haritun, in the Tekoa area
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S COOL RASHI OF THE WEEK
Every word of Rashi
counts. Especially the easy Rashis. If Rashi says something and explains
something he does it once. He doesn’t repeat himself. And if he explains himself a second time inevitably if you look carefully
at his words you will reveal something incredible in your understanding of the
verse.
This week Rashi explains
the mitzva of Tefillin. As we read the parsha and the mitzva, we appreciate we
have heard this mitzva before. We read it last week in the first chapter of
Shema as well as earlier in Bo twice. It’s fascinating to contrast the four
times that Rashi discusses this mitzva. The way he reads the verses and the
lessons that can be found.
In Bo (Shemos 13:9)
And it shall be for you as a sign on your hand and a rememberance between your
eyes in order that the Torah of Hashem should be in your mouth that with an
outstretched arm Hashem took you out of Egypt.
There Rashi says: And
it shall be a sign- The Exodus from Egypt shall be a sign
On your arm and a remembrance between your
eyes- that you shall write these parshas and tie them on your head and arm –interesting
point Rashi puts head before arm here different then the verse.
Later on at the end of
Bo (Shemos 13:16) the verse says- And it
shall be a sign on your hand and totafot between your eyes-
Rashi says-Totafot bein einecha- Tefilin;
they are thus named Totfot because of the four ‘houses’. Tat in kaspi
(language) Pat in african is 2.
Rashi then brings
another interpretation that Menachem connects them with the word taf to speak
that one who sees them tied between the eyes will remember the miracle.- Interesting
that Rashi brings this second pshat as well. Also it’s interesting that he
notes that it’s four because of four houses. Seemingly there are four portions.
This is different then what he does in Devarim
Last week’s Torah
portion in the first chapter of Shema we have the verse and you shall tie it
upon your hand and it shall be for totafot between your eyes
There Rashi says one word (Devarim 6:8) And
you shall tie on your hands- these are the tefilin of the arm
Interesting seemingly
Rashi told us that already except there he said that by the rosh but what else
would it be?
The next Rashi seems even more repitive- And
it shall be Totafor between your eyes- these are the Tefilin of the head-and
they are thus called by the number of the parshas they are called Totfot; Tat
is 2 in Katpi and Pat is 2 in African.
This is very strange
why does he repeat this if he told us this already? Here he separates between
the head and arm. And here as well he says it’s four because of the portions.
Finally in our portion
where we read the second parsha of Shema is read when he brings the mitzva of
Tefillin Rashi on the verse
And you shall place them- (upon your hearts
and your souls and you shall tie them on your hands and they shall be totafot
between your eyes)-Even after you are exiled you should be unique in your
mitzvos. Place Tefilin and make mezuzot in order that they shall not be like new
to you when you return.
I guess one central
question is why the Torah uses a word like totafot that is 2+2. Why not
just a word that is four? Another interesting question, that perhaps will
reflect and answer all of this is, what did it say in the tefillin that
the Jews wore in Egypt after this commandment, or in the wilderness until the
40th year when Moshe said the speech of Shema and Vehaya.
Many commentaries, and I believe Rashi as well feels this way is that until
Devarim they had four boxes but only the first two parshas. That would
explain why there he only says houses- not parshas. Here in Devarim
is when they totafot is for the Parshas. Also as well the tefillin
of Egypt as Rashi notes are about the exodus from Egypt. It is primarily a
mitzva of remembrance. Which is why he focuses on the head. Here in Devarim it
is about remembering the love of Hashem acceptance of his Kingship in the first
portion kabalat ol shamayim. The second portion is about accepting his
mitzvos. Here Rashi divides them up; Tefilin of head and Tefilin of arm- this
being the source for two distinct mitzvos. Whereas in Egypt it was primarily
one mitzva, as it is one theme. That will answer as well why he goes out of his
way to say 2+2. Two concepts in two places. There it is 4 houses 2+2 and here
it is 4 parshas 2+2. Rashi notes that this second Parsha the observance
of these particular commandments are being repeated to teach us that even in
Exile we must observe the commandments. Because we will return. It’s fantastic
how Rashi writes that as a given. The mitzvos the tefillin are our signs. They
are the sparks that we will return.
Each Rashi a lesson.
Each Rashi a world of insight.
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S COOL HISTORICAL EVENT THAT HAPPENED ON THIS
DATE IN ISRAEL OF THE WEEK-
Students of the Gaon
of Vilna come to Israel 26th Av 5569 - August 8, 1809- A group of 70 "Perushim"
Talmidim / Students of the great Lithuanian sage, the Vilna Gaon,
arrived in Eretz Yisroel, after traveling via Turkey by horse
and wagon. The name Perushim comes from the Hebrew parash,
meaning "to separate". The group sought to separate themselves from
what they saw as the impurities of the society around them in Europe, and the
name literally means 'separated (individuals)'. Coincidentally this was the
same name by which the Pharisees of antiquity were known.
The Vilna Gaon,
himself, set out for the Holy Land in 1783, but for unknown reasons did not
attain his goal. However, he inspired his disciples to make the move, and they
became pioneers of modern settlement in Eretz Yisroel. (A large
contingent of chassidic Jews arrived in Tzefat around the same
time.) HaRav Yisroel of Shklov, the leader of the 1809 group, settled in Tzefat,
and six years later moved to Yerushalayim where he founded the
modern Ashkenazic community. Many minhagei yerushalayim derive
from the traditions they brought with them.
Influenced by the Vilna
Gaon, who had wanted to go to Eretz Yisrael but was unable to do so, a large
group of his Perushim disciples and their families, numbering over 500, with a
few dozen younger earlier scouts, were inspired to follow his vision. The
perushim began their journey from the city of Shklov, about 300 kilometers
southeast of Vilna in Lithuania. The organization they formed was called Chazon
Tzion ("Prophecy/Vision [of] Zion"), and was based on three main
principles:
a)
Rebuild Jerusalem as the acknowledged Torah center of the
world
b)
Aid and speed the ingathering of the Jewish exile
c)
Expand the currently settled areas of the Land of Israel.
Enduring great
hardships and danger, they traveled to and settled in the Holy Land, where they
had a profound effect on the future history of the Yishuv haYashan- the Old
Yishuv.
Reaching the shores of
Palestine, however, was not the end of their journey. When the perushim first
arrived, they faced a ban on Ashkenazi Jews settling in Jerusalem. The ban had
been in effect from the early 18th century when, as a result of outstanding
debts, the Ashkenazi synagogues of the Old City had been forcibly closed and
many Ashkenazim were forced out of the city and barred from returning. While
some managed to evade the ban by entering Jerusalem disguised as Sephardi Jews,
most of the perushim journeyed on to Tzfat, where they joined a strong Sephardi
community that was already there. Besides the Sephardim, the community included
many Hasidic Jews, with whom the perushim had an ongoing feud. However, the two
groups set aside their ideological differences and worked hand in hand to
settle the land and develop their community and eventually intermarried.
Because flourishing
agriculture was seen as a sign of Redemption, the immigrants had brought
agricultural implements with them, so that they could observe the biblical
commandments connected to working the soil in the Holy Land.
In the year 1837 a devastating
earthquaqe hit Tzfat, leveled the city and seriously damaged Tiberias where
4,000 people perished, including about 2000 Jews and 200 members of the
perushim community in Safed.
Believing that the
catastrophe was a direct product of their neglect of Jerusalem, the surviving
members of the perushim community in Safed decided that the only hope for their
future in the Land of Israel would be to reestablish themselves in Jerusalem. However,
entrance to the Jerusalem could only be gained once the decree against
Ashkenazim had been annulled. The perushim could then reclaim ownership of the
Hurva Synagogue and its surrounding courtyard and homes, sites that were
historically Ashkenazi property.
The refugees succeeded
in renewing the Ashkenazi presence in Jerusalem, after nearly a hundred years
of banishment by the local Arabs. The arrival of the Perushim encouraged an
Ashkenazi revival in Jerusalem, which until that time had been mostly Sephardi.
The group, led by HaRav Yisroel of Shklov, zt"l, experienced many hardships. The early years were fraught with Arab attacks, earthquakes, and a cholera epidemic. Rav Yisroel authored,Pe'at Hashulchan, a digest of the Jewish agricultural laws relating to Eretz Yisroel. (He had to rewrite the book after the first manuscript was destroyed in a fire.) The location of his grave remained unknown until it was discovered in Tverye / Tiberias, 125 years after his death. Today, the descendants of that original group are amongst the most prominent families in Yerushalayim.
The group, led by HaRav Yisroel of Shklov, zt"l, experienced many hardships. The early years were fraught with Arab attacks, earthquakes, and a cholera epidemic. Rav Yisroel authored,Pe'at Hashulchan, a digest of the Jewish agricultural laws relating to Eretz Yisroel. (He had to rewrite the book after the first manuscript was destroyed in a fire.) The location of his grave remained unknown until it was discovered in Tverye / Tiberias, 125 years after his death. Today, the descendants of that original group are amongst the most prominent families in Yerushalayim.
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S FUNNY CHURCH
SIGNS OF THE WEEK
Coincidence is when God
chooses to remain anonymous
God answers knee-mail
Life has many choices.
Eternity has two. What’s yours?
Don’t give up. Moses was once
a basket case
Forbidden fruit creates many
jams
Don’t give God instructions –
just report for duty
Don’t say ‘Our Father’ on
Sabbath and spend the rest of the week acting like an orphan
If God were small enough for
us to understand, he wouldn’t be big enough for us to worship
Why pray when you can worry?
If you can’t sleep Don’t
count sheep Talk to the Shepherd
God doesn’t believe in
atheists; therefore atheists do not exist
Where will you be sitting in
eternity?Smoking or non-smoking?
We’re all invited to a
heavenly feast, but we must RSVP!
As long as there are tests,
there will be prayer in schools
Sorrow looks back, worry
looks around, faith looks up
You can believe in God now –
or later. Now is better
**************
Answer is C – The answer is George. A great name for a monk. The
Christians monks used to come to the Judean desert for seclusion and meditation
in the 4-6th centuries. There’s a bunch of them around. This one is
active. Nobody really cares. Except when you take a tour guiding exam.