Insights and Inspiration
from the
Holy Land
from
Rabbi Ephraim Schwartz
"Your friend in Karmiel"
December 20th 2019 -Volume 10 Issue 9 22nd
Kislev 5780
Parshat Vayeshev / Chanukah
A Spin on Dreidel
It's an ancient
tradition that we try to do observe. We light our menora's, we have Chanukah
parties, we sing holiday songs, and even compose a few and of course we eat
latkas and beingn in Israel jelly doughnuts. And there is of course driedel.
Now perhaps when we were kids this custom was fun as we sat around spun our sevivon
/ top and counted out pennies from the pot. The tradition has that it began
when the Greeks forbid us from learning Torah. The Jews would secretly study
and when the Greeks would come in they would hide their books and pretend to be
playing dreidel. Although that may be the source it seems that the custom to
play is only a few hundred years old or so. But that's good enough for me.
Now pennies or
even shekels and spinning tops were just not going to cut it for my chevra
in yeshiva. It was too childish and no fun or challenge. So it seems the
yeshiva world- although some of our Rebbes would probably protest at us
hijacking that distinguished title, came up with other alternatives to fulfill
the concept. The dreidel became a deck of cards. The game was given some name
that had some chassidic spiritual mystical element to it; Kvittlach. I think
it's yeshivish blackjack. Poker with some herring thrown in for good measure.
It involved some money changing hands. But everyone knew that Chanukah gelt is
a mitzva, right? I guess the only connection that it had with the original
custom was that when the Rebbeim would walk in they would hide the cards and
money and pull out a sefer and pretend to be studying. So it's almost
like the real thing.
I personally
was never a gambler. Probably because any gelt that I did have I used to
buy sufganiyot and shwarmas. I tried learning the kvittlach game once but it
was beyond me. I still have no clue what an elevaroon is. Maybe an
elevated macaroon? Instead I went to
visit my good friend in more of a "fun" yeshiva. Those were "my
'other' boys". My yeshiva was where I would learn. Theirs was where I
would go when I needed to get away for a bit.
It was late at night, after seder of course
when I arrived there. My buddy Yanky was sitting down with some of my friends
discussing the Chanukah night activity for the evening. These were not
kvittlach people. At the same time the typical card games were too lame. One of
them finally came up with a great idea. Monopoly! Now I was a big board game
person. Risk, Stratego, chess, games that required using our yeshivish noggin
and beating someone else with our incredible strategies. Conquering the world,
killing kings capturing flags. We were good at that. Monopoly is a luck and
throw of the dice game. What's the kuntz?
The boys smiled
at me and pulled out the game. They replaced the monopoly bills right away with
shekels. Now I know that shekels are painted to look like monopoly money. I
tell my tourists so that it's that they shouldn't confuse it with real money.
Otherwise your typical American could get sticker shock 100's of shekel for
this and for that. But once you realize it's not real money, it's only shekels
then it's not so bad.
But this was
different. Monopoly with real money, albeit shekels is a totally different
game. Do I buy this? Do I build? All of a sudden these question have real financial
consequences? Hmmm. It sounded interesting. Not having any money, I sat down to
watch (Ok maybe I chucked in a few shekels…Shhh…). The game became more and
more intense as the night wore on. The trading got heavy, the arguments and
under the table deals were heating up. And all of a sudden…Boom, the door
opened.
In front of us stood Rabbi G., the Rosh
yeshiva. Now this was not my yeshiva. I wasn't too worried. But, it was still
scary watching his face as he took in the scene before his eyes. He looked at
Yanky with a stern glare and asked him what was going on. Without batting an
eye Yanky turned to his Rosh Yeshiva and told his Rebbe,
"Can you
believe this? He wants me to trade him Pacifc and Atlantic for Mediterranean
and Park Place., what does Rebbe have to say about that?"
I will never
forget Rabbi G.'s expression and response. He looked at Yanky. He understood
his boys. He knew when to fight 'em, when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em.
"What!" Rabbi G. said, "Mediterranean?!
Even Kollel guys don't live on Mediterranean…!"
Oy…. Those were
the days. I think Yanky got his schmooze on the evils of gambling the next day,
but in my opinion the wisdom, self-control and wit of that Rebbe, taught me an
even more important lesson. One has to see the big picture of connecting with
you students over losing it all over a game of monopoly. It's a lesson I will
never forget.
It's Chanuka
this week, My Chanuka box is out with all my Chanukah paraphernalia. Menora,
silver polish, candles wicks, oils, and Happy Hanukah signs and of course
dreidels. What is the deeper concept behind this dreidel? Now we know that there
are four letters Nun Gimmel, Shin and Hey or Pey, which
stand for Neis Gadol Haya Sham - A great miracle happened there or
alternatively Po-here. The difference of course is depending on if you
are playing in Israel or the Diaspora. Although I understand that Satmar and
some other shall we call them "not-pro-Zionist" of our brethren don't
use the "peh-here" ones even here in Israel either. It seems
they claim it’s a Zionist invention. Although a gambling game of spin-the
Jewish-top would seem like a lame place to start declaring religious
indignation about foreign secular influences. But hey... I would never crash
anyone's fun or party as Rabbi G taught me.
But the truth
is that there is something sacred about the dreidel spinning game. There were
great Rabbis like the students of the Baal Shem Tov, the Chasam Sofer, and
(lbl'ch) Reb Chaim Kanievsky even recalls that his father the Steipler played
dreidel with them as children. It's fascinating that when they went through the
concentration camps storehouses where they Nazi's kept the items they
confiscated from the Jews many dreidels were found. It seems that the Jews who
were limited by what they could bring with them to these camps, somehow many of
them felt the dreidel was something to bring. One can imagine the clandestine
games in their barracks late at night. They may not have been able to light a
menora, but at least they had something to remind them of the miracles of old
and to give them faith that it could happen again.
There are many
different insights about the dreidel game. The Bnai Yissachar sees it as the
difference between Chanuka and Purim where as in Purim we spin the gragger from
bottom, Chanuka the dreidel is pun from the top (excuse the pun). On Chanuka
the miracle came openly from Hashem it was clear he was running the show. The
Jews did not merit redemption or the miracle as most of them had assimilated.
Hashem had to spin that dreidel from above. On Purim we fasted, we prayed and
we repented. We turned the grogger and made the noise and Hashem in kind
responded.
Rebbi Nachman
of Breslav has an incredible insight into the dreidel game though. He notes
that the dreidel is like life. We spin and we spin and we fall. Sometimes when
we fall we are gadol- we are great we win. Other times we are Nun-
nisht nothing, sometimes we pay, sometimes we lose half. But we pick
ourselves up and spin again. Sometimes it's our turn and the next spin it could
be my neighbors and other game players turn. Life is constantly spinning and we
are constantly waiting to see where it will fall. Some spins are longer some
are shorter. The one thing that unites all of the players though, is when you
can't see the letters. When it is turning around and around and it all looks
like one. That is the message we are meant to view life in. We are all on a
dreidel and we are all part of the miracle. Today's shin could be
tommorow's gimmel.
The parsha that
we read this week before Chanuka Vayeishev (and you thought I'd forgotten about
this part of the E-Mail…shame) is also like a dreidel and completes this message.
The Rokayach notes that almost every single verse in the parsha begins with the
letter vav, which translates as "and". And this… and that… and
this… and he came… and he settled …and he went… It’s a parsha
on the move. It's a parsha that is constantly spinning. The vav is like that little handle on
the top of the dreidel that Hashem is spinning. Yosef is the favorite child. He
got a colored coat. He got the first gimmel. But then he is thrown down
in a pit. He falls. Shin. Yaakov is settled and happy. Gimmel. He
falls in mourning for his kidnapped son. Shin Reuvein is the oldest, and
he loses his postion, Yehuda is the leader and he falls. Tamar is on the bottom
and then she rises up. They all ultimately rise again. It's one continuation.
They're all spinning. It's ironic that the parsha is called Vayeishev-
and he settled because no one seems settled after the first verse. But the Torah
is not ironic. It is settled like our dreidel. It falls, but then rises and
spins again.
Do you know how
many verses don’t start with vav in the parsha? Eight. Yup. Eight days
of Chanuka. Interestingly enough there is another book that also has every
verse, besides eight, that start with the letter vav that connects it
all together. That is spinning the entire story. It is the book of Ruth. There,
as well, people are rising and falling. Elimelech, and his two sons are the
leaders and they flee Israel and ultimately intermarry and die. Naomi who was once
the big Rebbetzin comes back as a pauper. Rus is a former princess and she now
is begging for wheat and charity. It's an amazing story. But the end of that
story is the birth of the grandfather of King David; the beginning of the
messianic line.
That messianic
line had its start in our parsha. The beginning of the driedel game centuries
before with Yehuda and Tamar the ancestors of Boaz. The great miracle is
happening here. Do you know what the gematria of Nun Gimmel Shin
and Hey is? 358. Do you know what else is that same gematria?
Mashiach.
The top is
spinning. This Sunday night we will light our menoras. We will sing Maoz Tzur. It's
a song about all of our exiles. We start with Egypt, we go through Bavel,
Chanuka and Purim. We conclude with the final exile that we still in and ask
Hashem to bring Mashiach. Then we pull out our dreidel and watch it spin in the
glow of those candles. May the dreidel of Klal Yisrael finally land on
that winning letter. We want the gantzeh pot. It's time for the Nes Gadol.
Rabbi Ephraim
Schwartz
********************************
RABBI SCHWARTZ’S FAVORITE YIDDISH PROVERB OF THE WEEK
“Ainem’s mazel
iz an anderen’s shlemazel."– One’s good luck is another’s misfortune.
RABBI SCHWARTZ’S COOL VIDEO OF THE WEEK
https://soundcloud.com/ephraim-schwartz/al-hanissim - My latest hit in honor of Chanuka,
sung and arranged by Dovid Lowy Al Hanissim
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psgiydX4f3k – Dovid Lowy's (yes, the one and the same above
who has begun arranging my songs )Newest awesome song for Chanuka Shiru!
Enjoy….Check it out!
https://soundcloud.com/ephraim-schwartz/chasof-zeroah- And my composition for last year's
Chanuka hit and still my favorite Chanuka song Chaasof Zeroa arranged and sung
by Yitz Berry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRGlpowJQeM
- This week with the accompanying video-
Makes it so much better worth the watch again… 613 AKA Pella Star Wars Chanuka-
Couldn't stop laughing…
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S TOUR GUIDE EXAM QUESTION OF THE WEEK
answer below at end of Email
5) According to
the Book of Joshua, Jerusalem was within the tribal territory of:
A.
Reuben
- Benjamin (Binyamin)
- Dan
- None of the tribes
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S PARSHA/MITZVA CONNECTION OF THE WEEK
Yevama Yavo
Aleha– Yibum and
Chalitza the Levirate marriage- In this week's Torah portion we are introduced to the
concept of yibum, although in pre-Sinatic times, meaning before it was given as
a mitzva. We are told the story of Yehudah, his children and Tamar. In a
nutshell Tamar marries son number one and then he dies, she then marries son
number 2 and he dies. When it comes to son number three Yehudah doesn't want
her to marry him. So now she remains it seems from the text in limbo. The
reason is because as long as a woman whose husband dies without children is not
released from that relationship-via chalitza as we shall explain- she is
obligated to "continue" that marriage with her husband's brother in
order to perform the ultimate act of kindness which is providing and heir that
will carry on the brother's name. In biblical times before the giving of the
Torah this mitzva could be fulfilled by any close relative. Seeing she was not
going to be able to fulfill the mitzva, she disguised herself and seduced
Yehuda, her father-in-law and became pregnant with child. When word got out and
she was sentenced to death for having "cheated" on her husband's
brother, who was officially supposed to marry her, she refused to shame
Yehudah, throwing the ball in his court, to allow him the prerogative to fess
up. Which he did. The child by the way ultimately became the great granddaddy
of King David. So all's well that ends well, I guess.
Now this
mitzva, surprisingly enough to many of you is still in force today. There are a
few differences though, First of all the only ones that are obligated to fulfill
this mitzva and the women only becomes forbidden to marry anyone if her husband
has brothers. If he does not have brothers, she's free to go. No other
relatives and certainly not her father-in-law are obliged to fulfill this
mitzva. As well the woman can be released from this obligation, or marriage
really, as I'll explain by undergoing a process called chalitza. Once
she does this process then she is again free to marry anyone else.
The idea behind
this mitzva according to the Chinuch is because a woman and a man become like
one in marriage, and that union is meant to produce and heir that will continue
their work in this world. When a man dies without an heir then her husband's
closest relative, his brother, fills that role for him, creating that legacy
and caring for his wife and giving the two of them the eternality they came to
this world to achieve. The Abarbanel takes a more pragmatic approach and
suggests that this mitzva is more about assuring the wife that she will remain
cared for by the family that she has become part of. By bearing her husband's child
through his brother, she is assuring herself and her descendants a place in the
family that she joined when she married her husband. Other's see on this many
mystical aspects that take place in this union and the descension of souls and
eternal rest that is achieved in this union. But I'm not a mystic so I can't
fill you in all those details.
This mitzva is
seen as one of the greatest acts of kindness and mercy one can perform. For the
man (yavam) and the woman (yevama) are giving the most precious
gift, their ability to bear children with someone they never chose for
themselves in order to perpetuate the deceased's name. The truth is that this
process is so obvious in the Torah as a natural act of kindness, that they
couple does not even require a marriage. The brother just steps into his other
brother's marriage, although rabbinically there was a process called maamar
where they would agree to the union. It as a result of this that even today a
woman in such a situation cannot marry someone else as long as they are in the yevama
state. Yet despite the significance of the this mitzva today yibum
is an act that is generally not practiced.
The reason why
this is not practiced is that there are opinions in the Talmud that if one does
not do this for the sake of the mitzva rather he does it for his own selfish
and personal reasons, then it is preferable not to do this. Now although the
general rule in the Talmud seems to be of the opinion that it is still
preferable to do yibum because of the spiritual aspects of the mitzva
and the ramifications of it and in fact that this was the ruling of the Rambam
and most of the Sefardic authorities, the ashkenazic custom was not do preform
the mitzva today as a result of this. The Torah does give an alternative and
that is Chalitza which literally means the removal. In this process the woman
and the brother arrive in the Court. A special sandal is worn by the man and it
is removed and the woman spits in it in order to humiliate the man declaring
that "This is what happens to the man who does not build his brother's
house." After that process she is then permitted to marry any other
man.
This mitzva
became a very relevant mitzva in recent times after the Holocaust where
tragically many people married and their husbands were killed before they had
children. They were taken away perhaps to camps and survived the war but were
unable to re-marry as long as they knew that their husband had a brother
despite the fact that they had no clue as to his whereabouts. Halachically speaking
they required chalitza from him to permit them to remarry. This was a
major project of many of the great Rabbis after the war (along with of course
finding information of peoples disappeared husbands, as well who's wives
couldn't remarry until there was proof of death) in tracking down the siblings
of the husband and preforming this ritual. Today the policy of the Rabbanut of
the State of Israel is that they do not preform Yibum, for Ashkenazim or
Sefardim. Rav Ovadia Yosef however disagreed with this ruling and would permit
Sefardim to perform this mitzva.
This mitzva is
certainly one of the more mystical ones of the Torah, yet it is through this
mitzva that King David and the Messianic line is brought forth to the world.
May we finally see that redemption and an end to all tragedies.
RABBI SCHWARTZ'S ERA’S AND THEIR PLACES AND PEOPLE IN
ISRAEL OF THE WEEK
Civil War Yiftach's
final action 982 BC –It is fascinating to follow Tanach and its stories
through until the end. In the Torah there are two tribes that are viewed as the
ideal brothers, the first that never fight in the Torah Ephraim and Menashe,
the two sons of Yosef. We bless our children each Friday night that they should
grow up like these two special tribes…. Ummmm… it's a good thing that no one
learns Tanach, because these two tribes went at it like no one's business in
the book of Shoftim. Let's see.
After Yiftach's
victory over the Ammonites, the tribe of Ephraim which had previously
complained to Gideon about being left out of the battle, now came to Yiftach
with complaints as well. Except unlike Gideon where they at least got to
participate in the end of the battle and everything was discussed respectfully,
by Yiftach they didn't fight at all and they came with guns blazing. They told
Yiftach how dare he go to fight without them and they threatened to come burn
down his house. Big mistake. See, Yiftach was no Gideon, he was a hooligan, I
mean the guy just shechted his own daughter possibly. He certainly wasn't going
to take this from Ephraim. Particularly since for years Ephraim sat back and
watched Gilead, Yiftach's area of the tribe of Menashe where he ruled, get run
over by the Ammonites and they didn't raise a hand to help. So they went to
war.
Yiftach and his
band of merry men of Gilead killed 42,000 of the tribe of Ephraim. That is an
incredible and incomprehensible number! To put it in perspective there were
only 32,500 (men between 20-60) that entered the land of Israel less than 2
centuries before. Not only that but the fleeing troops of Ephraim across the
Jordan River where stopped by Yiftach's men and when they tried to pretend that
they weren't from Ephraim, their accent gave them away (they couldn't pronounce
certain words), they were slaughtered by the banks of the Jordan River
crossing. The lesson is, of course, to learn the accent not just the language.
Lesson number 2 be careful who you elect to be your leader. Lesson 3 Don't
complain and pick a fight with hooligans.
But perhaps the
only real lesson that Chazal give us, is that Jews should not look down upon
other Jews. The tribe of Ephraim, thought they were better than those that
lived on the other side of the Jordan. They weren't really living in Israel in
their minds. They weren't as holy. Maybe they were Sefardim and not Ashkenazi enough.
Maybe they were not as Torah knowledgeable.
They weren't yeshiva educated. They were country hicks. Maybe they were
good enough to serve in the army. To fight off Ammon. But they weren't good
enough to be counted with the rest of the nation. It's a fight and argument
that led to the first of many civil wars we will find in Tanach. Sadly, it's
lessons haven't entirely been learned today as well.
Yitachs dies
and the Navi tells us he is buried in "the cities of Israel". Our
sages tell us that he had a debilitating disease and his limbs fell off. Each
city it fell off they buried it there. The message I believe is that there is a
little Yiftach everywhere. His limbs are amongst us. Just as we are told that
each Jew has a bit of Moshe, each city has a bit of Yiftach. We can lead, we
can do tremendous things for the Jewish people, but at the same time we a can destroy
our families, our people and our legacy. That is the legacy of this shofet.
RABBI SCHWARTZ’S TERRIBLE DREIDEL GAMBLING JOKES OF
THE WEEK
What did the
father dreidel say to his daughter when he came home from work and found her
still in the shower? What! Your still not dry and ready?
What did the
dreidel tell the doctor? I've been having these dizzy spells
Q: What do you call Hanukkah gelt
that you gamble with? A: Chocolate chips.
Q: Did you hear about the two
dreidels that fell in love? A: They met at a spin class.
Q: How did the dreidel feel about
calling in sick? A: He felt a little gelty.
A rabbi, a
minister, and a priest were playing poker when the police raided the game.
Turning to the
priest, the lead police officer said, "Father Murphy, were you
gambling?"
Turning his
eyes to heaven, the priest whispered, "L*rd, forgive me for what I am
about to do." To the police officer, he then said, "No,
officer; I was not gambling."
The officer
then asked the minister, "Pastor Johnson, were you gambling?"
Again, after an
appeal to heaven, the minister replied, "No, officer; I was not
gambling."
Turning to the
rabbi, the officer again asked, "Rabbi Goldstein, were you
gambling?"
Shrugging his
shoulders, the rabbi replied, "With whom?
"My son is
something else," Mrs.
Finkelstein told her friend. "He traveled to Las Vegas last week in a
$25,000 car and returned a few days later in a $100,000 vehicle."
"Wow! He
won that much money?" her friend replied. "He must really know how to gamble."
"Well,
not really," said the mother. "He went in our car, but had to
return by bus."
When Rivkah was
called up for jury service, she asked the judge whether she could be excused.
"I don’t believe in capital punishment," she said, "and I wouldn’t want my views to prevent the trial from running its proper course".
The judge liked her thoughtfulness but had to tell her that she was perfectly suitable to serve on the jury.
"Madam," he explained, "This is not a murder trial, it's just a simple civil lawsuit. Mrs F is bringing this case against her husband because he gambled away the entire $25,000 he had promised her for her birthday so that she could carry out a make-over on her kitchen."
"OK," said Rivkah, "I'll join your jury - I could be wrong about capital punishment after all."
"I don’t believe in capital punishment," she said, "and I wouldn’t want my views to prevent the trial from running its proper course".
The judge liked her thoughtfulness but had to tell her that she was perfectly suitable to serve on the jury.
"Madam," he explained, "This is not a murder trial, it's just a simple civil lawsuit. Mrs F is bringing this case against her husband because he gambled away the entire $25,000 he had promised her for her birthday so that she could carry out a make-over on her kitchen."
"OK," said Rivkah, "I'll join your jury - I could be wrong about capital punishment after all."
Moishe meets
Arnold at their social club and asks how Abe’s funeral went the other day.
"It went OK, Moishe," replied Arnold, "but at the end of the Rabbi’s eulogy, I had to try and stop myself from laughing aloud."
"Why was that?" asks Moishe.
"Well," says Arnold, "throughout his marriage to Miriam, she was always telling me what a mean man he was. He never had a steady job and the money he brought home to her wasn't enough for food and clothing, let alone holidays. Yet he drank heavily and often stayed out all night gambling. Altogether, a good husband he was not. But at the funeral, the Rabbi spoke of how wonderful the deceased was - so considerate, so beloved, so thoughtful to others. Then, when the Rabbi had finished, I heard Miriam say to one of her children, "Do me a favour, David, go see whether it’s your father in the coffin."
"It went OK, Moishe," replied Arnold, "but at the end of the Rabbi’s eulogy, I had to try and stop myself from laughing aloud."
"Why was that?" asks Moishe.
"Well," says Arnold, "throughout his marriage to Miriam, she was always telling me what a mean man he was. He never had a steady job and the money he brought home to her wasn't enough for food and clothing, let alone holidays. Yet he drank heavily and often stayed out all night gambling. Altogether, a good husband he was not. But at the funeral, the Rabbi spoke of how wonderful the deceased was - so considerate, so beloved, so thoughtful to others. Then, when the Rabbi had finished, I heard Miriam say to one of her children, "Do me a favour, David, go see whether it’s your father in the coffin."
Rabbi Bloom
gets on the train and as soon as the doors close, a priest gets up, goes over
to the rabbi and says, "Good morning rabbi. I have a question to ask
you. Why is it that everybody thinks Jews are smarter than Gentiles?"
Rabbi Bloom, who is not up for an argument, says, "I’m sorry, but I am just a simple rabbi and I’m not really able to participate in such a discussion."
But the priest insists. "Look, no harm meant rabbi, but I have a theory and I need to test it out in the form of a bet. I’ll pay you $100 if you can ask me a question that I can't answer. But if I can ask you a question that you can't answer, you must pay me $100."
Rabbi Bloom replies, "But I’m a poor rabbi - I only have $10 on me."
The priest hesitates then says, "OK, rabbi, it’s my $100 against your $10."
Rabbi Bloom realises he can't get out of this so he agrees, but on condition that he asks the first question. The priest agrees.
"OK," says Rabbi Bloom, "what animal has scaly skin, the body of a cat, the face of a squirrel, the ears of a mouse, webbed toes and swims under water?"
Surprised, the priest admits that he doesn't know and asks the rabbi for a few more minutes to think about it. The rabbi agrees.
2 minutes later, the priest takes $100 from his wallet and gives it to the rabbi. The priest then asks the rabbi, "So what animal was it?"
Rabbi Bloom replies, "How should I know?" and gives the priest $10.
Rabbi Bloom, who is not up for an argument, says, "I’m sorry, but I am just a simple rabbi and I’m not really able to participate in such a discussion."
But the priest insists. "Look, no harm meant rabbi, but I have a theory and I need to test it out in the form of a bet. I’ll pay you $100 if you can ask me a question that I can't answer. But if I can ask you a question that you can't answer, you must pay me $100."
Rabbi Bloom replies, "But I’m a poor rabbi - I only have $10 on me."
The priest hesitates then says, "OK, rabbi, it’s my $100 against your $10."
Rabbi Bloom realises he can't get out of this so he agrees, but on condition that he asks the first question. The priest agrees.
"OK," says Rabbi Bloom, "what animal has scaly skin, the body of a cat, the face of a squirrel, the ears of a mouse, webbed toes and swims under water?"
Surprised, the priest admits that he doesn't know and asks the rabbi for a few more minutes to think about it. The rabbi agrees.
2 minutes later, the priest takes $100 from his wallet and gives it to the rabbi. The priest then asks the rabbi, "So what animal was it?"
Rabbi Bloom replies, "How should I know?" and gives the priest $10.
***********************************
Answer is D– So this question is also a bit
tricky, but for anyone that tours Yerushalayim it is pretty essential. So on
the one hand we have Dovid is really the first one it tells us that conquers
Yerushalayim. On the other hand in the book of Shoftim it mentions the tribe of
Yehudah fighting and conquering Yerushalyim. So it's a bit of a contradiction.
So of course the commentaries deal with the question of which Yerushalayim is
it? Maybe there are different parts. In the Book of Yehoshuah though when
giving the borders of the tribe of Yehudah and Binyamin it mentions that they
are both bordered by Yerushalayim. The Talmud tells us it was divided in
between the two tribes, the line went in fact right through the Temple Mount.
(Incidentally that's why some suggest it was chosen, so that no tribe could
claim more importance. Yehudah representing the children of Leah and Binyamin
of Rachel- which the same reason Washington DC which is not in any state was
chosen) So the correct answer is that it really isn't solely in any tribe at
least in the book of Yehoshuah. Reuven and Dan were just giveaway answers if
you guessed those you should not be a tour guide. So we continue with the score being Schwartz
3 and 2 for MOT (Ministry of Tourism) on
this exam.
No comments:
Post a Comment